Classic YouTube: Zell Miller Challenges Chris Matthews To A Duel

Filed Under: Other

In this classic clip former senator Zell Miller fires back at Chris Matthews and challenges him to a duel.

Part 1:

YouTube Preview Image

Part 2:

YouTube Preview Image
| doctor horton | Leave a comment

Where does a society that denies absolute truth find the framework to discuss ethical issues anyway?

Filed Under: Other

The firestorm of ethical discussion that has ensued in the media over the birth of the IVF octuplets has been interesting.

In his blog Secondhand Smoke Wesley Smith offers some interesting commentary regarding the public discussion of ethics this story has produced.

But when you think about it: How can there even be a question of laws and ramifications in this day and age? The door to realistic norms and binding ethical constraints has not just been unlocked over the last few decades, it has been torn off the hinges. In today’s world, doctors are becoming less professionals and more order taking technicians. Want an abortion? Take a number. Want assisted suicide? Take a number. Want to invest $500,000 into your face with cosmetic surgery? Take a number. You want your children genetically tested before deciding whether they are worth having? Take a number. Get pregnant with three IVF embryos and only want one, take a number to “selectively reduce” the two you don’t want so you can raise an only child. A single woman, without a job, who already has six kids and wants eight more? Take a number.

Associated Links:

Wesley Smith blog post

LA Times article

| doctor horton | Leave a comment

Merely Reporting the Facts, or Leading Us to a Conclusion?

Filed Under: Other

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,485924,00.html

Reports are circulating that cast an unflattering light on the miracle mom who gave birth to octuplets in California Monday.

| Mr. MacIan | 1 Comment

How does he know that he is not misinformed?

Filed Under: Other

Samuel L. Jackson Says Mormon Supporters of Prop 8 ‘Misinformed’

| doctor horton | 2 Comments

Bornalivetruth.org on Mattersoftruth.com

Filed Under: Other

Gianna Jessen is a courageous young woman who has survived a saline abortion.  Today she is engaging the culture of death with a culture of life.  She recently started a website called www.bornalivetruth.org.  From this website she has launched an ad that seeks to inform voters on Barack Obama’s record against the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act.

YouTube Preview Image
You can read more about Barack Obama’s record against the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act here.

Gianna was recently interviewed on Hannity and Colmes.

YouTube Preview Image

You can read more about Gianna Jessen’s story here:

Gianna Jessen does not quit. Giving up is not an option to her. Gianna has what she refers to as the “gift” of Cerebral Palsy. She weighed a mere 2 lbs at birth and the doctors said she would never be able to hold up her head, sit up, crawl or walk. She began to walk by the age of three years old with the help of leg braces and a walker.

Gianna doesn’t believe that her Cerebral Palsy takes away her life, but, rather, enriches it. . . she walks with a slight limp today and runs marathons. On April 30, 2005 she completed her first 26.2 mile marathon after running just over 7 hours and was presented with the coveted blank blank award! On April 23, 2006 she completed the London Marathon as well. She is now determined to run marathons all over the place, because she was never supposed to even walk!

Gianna understands the plight of orphans, being one herself. She was placed into the foster care system early on in life, eventually being taken into the loving home of a woman named Penny. Penny has been a mother to 56 foster children in her life. Gianna was later adopted by Penny’s daughter, making Penny Gianna’s grandmother. According to Gianna, Penny saved her life.

Gianna is a Christian. Her life was given to her by the grace of God. She shouldn’t be walking, but more miraculous still; she should not even be alive. Gianna’s biological mother was 17 when she had a saline abortion in her third trimester. Many Americans don’t realize it is legal to have an abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy. After being burned alive for approximately 18 hours in the womb from the saline solution, Gianna was delivered alive in a Los Angeles County abortion clinic. Her medical records state, “born during saline abortion”…this is what caused her Cerebral Palsy.

Gianna’s travels and experiences have led her all over the world. Her life has been covered by many major news media outlets, including, most recently, the BBC News and World Radio, Sky News, and The Good Morning Show in England, reaching many people with a message of hope and conviction. In November 2005, Gianna spoke in several colleges all over Ireland and in December of the same year, spoke at a meeting held at the House of Commons in London. She has returned to England this year to speak in several parochial and public high schools. Gianna’s audiences include: churches – church youth crusades and women’s ministry retreats; various corporations as a motivational speaker; secular and Christian youth organizations and schools – middle school age through college, as well as several times before Congress – most recently having her testimony read before the Supreme Court in Carhart v. Gonzales

| doctor horton | Leave a comment

Blacksburg, Virginia 4/16/07

Filed Under: Other, Philosophy, Theology

Virginia Tech MassacreThe Night Before.

I remember thinking that the night before seemed darker than usual. It may have been because of the incredible wind. Living in Blacksburg I had seen strong winds before, but this night the wind was stronger. I stayed awake listening to the wind beat the tree against my window and studying for a pharmacology test – the big one that I had to pass. I eventually went to sleep, but only to be awakened several times throughout the night by sounds of this distinctively strong wind.

The Morning.

The alarm went off and the morning rush commenced. I was in and out of the shower with clothes thrown on and with time to spare for a quick review before the test. I went through the normal pretest routine and checklist.  I had the timing down pat.  I could be out of my front door and in my classroom seat ready to test in three minutes! With my pencils freshly sharpened I was out the door. A gust of wind slammed my front door closed as I rushed out to the car. I remember thinking, “Good grief that wind is strong!” I quickly found a parking space and muscled my way out of the car and into class.

Little did I know, 32 people were being gunned down a mile away as I penciled in the bubbles on the scan-tron. The test was long and when I had finished he had finished and morning was over – but the mourning had just begun. I later found out that several classmates who were first responders had finished their tests early and responded to the shooting and played vital roles in the crisis.  I returned to the house to grab some food and relax after the test and before we were scheduled to be back in class.  I remember hearing an odd noise and thinking, “Is that somebody on a bullhorn outside?” I couldn’t tell exactly what it was because the wind was drowning out the noise, but the noise came and went over several minutes. I remember wondering if the SWAT team was in my apartment complex. I then had a flashback to an event on the first day of classes of the 2006-2007 VT school year when a prisoner escaped from police custody, stole an officer’s gun, evaded capture for two days and killed several people.  My next thought was, “I wonder if there has been a shooting.” I quickly turned on the TV and heard the headlines: “Shooting at Virginia Tech, 2 killed.”

I remained glued to the TV for the rest of the day as the story unfolded. There were many comments on the news about strong winds grounding the helicopters. At one point early on VT announced a convocation service for the next day. It was at that time that I knew that the situation was worse than what we were being told. However, no one knew how much worse. There were 33 fatalities including the killer.

My apartment was located on one of the main streets into the campus.  In my mind I can still hear the sirens and see the line of state police cars pouring into town which did not stop at all that day.  Later that evening a few of my friends and I drove through town.  The Virginia state police were all over campus.  They were imposing figures who stood surveying the scene with shotguns in hand. It was real.

The Mourning.

Almost immediately Matt Drudge’s siren was sitting on top of the Hokie Nation, questions were being formulated, Geraldo was making unfounded ignorant accusations, and Brian Williams and Matt Lauer were on planes to Blacksburg. We awoke the next morning to a sea of media. We were told that the president was coming to town.  Though the line into Cassell Coliseum was insane, my friend and I were able to make it inside for the service.   The service was nice, but I remember coming out feeling frustrated and grieved at the consolations which were offered. The message communicated was that Virginia Tech would seek and ultimately find its solace and healing within the strength and power of its community – within ourselves. Amidst the empty chants of “We will prevail, we are Virginia Tech” and “Lets go Hokies” there was a ray of light that broke through the dark service.  As one person in the crowd spontaneously spoke out the Lord’s prayer, an entire stadium joined in, and for a brief moment we looked outside of ourselves for answers and healing.

The Following Days, Weeks, and Months After.

In the days that followed bodies were buried, vigils and memorials were held, and cards were signed. The campus was filled with makeshift memorials from around the country. I found out that one of my neighbors was a victim. Her cat kept coming to my front door. Everybody knew somebody who knew somebody. This indeed was a headline which hit home.

There is one scene that I will never forget as long as I live. I waited 2 or 3 days before I walked down to the scene with my brother and our friend. It was evening when we walked, and they told me about classes they had once had on the second floor in Norris Hall and described the layout of the rooms. We walked around the building in disbelief. We walked on the front sidewalk across which rescuers carried the bleeding injured. As we walked on that sidewalk in front of the building I said hello to the officer and looked down at my feet. I gasped when I realized what I was looking at—it was a bloodstain.

One Year Later.

Ecclesiastes 1:6 The wind blows to the south and goes around to the north; around and around goes the wind, and on its circuits the wind returns.

Today is one year later and the winds of violence continue to blow through our country as I saw headlines just this week of school closings due to threats. Next year at this time we will be marking the 10th anniversary of Columbine. I fear that there is still a critical lesson to be learned from Virginia Tech, Jonesborough, Paducah, Columbine, Northern Illinois, and others. As a culture we have abandoned the ideal of the absolute dignity of human life. Our culture indoctrinates at an early age with a dogma that tells us we are a clump of cells without transcendent meaning.  The dogma leads us to conclude that we are warts on the face of a random universe that somehow came into order out of a disorderly nothing and continues to randomly progress against the principles of entropy. We should not be shocked when there are those who arrive at a conclusion that human beings have no more absolute intrinsic value, meaning, worth, or dignity than any other speck of matter. Disregard for the dignity of human life sown, disregard for the dignity of human life reaped.

The issues we are now facing need to be addressed with truth. We must seek to cultivate a culture of life that will recover the ideal of human dignity and restore its emphasis in all of our institutions.

Please take time to listen to following responses to the events of 4/16/07.

| doctor horton | Leave a comment

Hating Huckabee

Filed Under: Politics

Mike Huckabee Having noticed yesterday that Mike Huckabee has a new website launch on the horizon, I casually wondered what was being planned. Evidently the folks at Hotair, a conservative website that I frequent, could not pass on the opportunity to speculate as to what the cryptic title “Coming Soon” means. It is no secret that many Hotair subscribers do not particularly like Mike Huckabee, and even a post about a Mike Huckabee web-page that says “Coming Soon” elicits some of the most ridiculous rhetoric.

Examine, for instance, this exchange between commenter EJDolbow and myself:

Me: It’s amazing how a website page that says, “coming soon” can compel such animosity. Sheesh.

EJDolbow: Mike Huckabee damaged the Republican Party. He needs to go away and stay away.

I might interject that perhaps the current Republican party orthodoxy might need to be damaged. But that is another discussion. Continuing,

Me: But, one thing is for certain: I thought conservative not only supported, but advocated, divesrity of ideas in the public arena. So why are some many self-proclaimed conservatives suggesting that “[h]e needs to go away and stay away?”

EJDolbow: The reason he needs to go away is because he is attaching himself like a sucker to this party. If he wants to split and start the Party of Pastors, that would be great.

I said in following comments that it is a bedrock principle of Conservative thought that the diversity of ideas should not only be defended, but advocated and advanced as well. What the particular commenter I have highlighted, as well as several others not highlighted, have suggested is that Huckabee needs to go away. To be fair, they probably do not really mean that he should literally go away (as in get out of politics), but I wonder what they really do mean?

| Mr. MacIan | 5 Comments

A Call to Sanity: John McCain’s Straight Talk is Double Talk

Filed Under: Politics

John McCainDr. James Dobson was on Hannity and Colmes last night (3.30.2008), and he was asked whether he would participate in the elections this November. The question was likely prompted by Dobson’s quite vocal dissent against a John McCain Presidency. Dr. Dobson said that he hoped that “we won’t get stuck” with McCain, citing, among other things, his belief that McCain does not hold conservative positions on social issues like marriage and abortion.

On the show yesterday, Dobson declined to elaborate whether he would support any of the three candidates running for President, but he did say that he would participate in the November elections because other offices besides the Presidency will be on the ballot. True to form, Sean Hannity tried to warm Dr. Dobson to a McCain presidency by trying to alleviate Dobson’s concerns about McCain’s social positions. Hannity told Dobson that just a few weeks ago John McCain pledged to support both the marriage and pro-life planks of the Republican platform.

But should this alleviate the concerns of social conservatives? I do not believe so. Let’s first examine the relevant exchange between Sean Hannity and John McCain.

HANNITY: And I think one of the areas that came up the most is would you leave the pro-life language in the platform and the marriage amendment in the platform?

MCCAIN: Yes. But as you know, I believe that the states should make these decisions on the marriage amendment. I am a Federalist and I believe that states like mine and other states that we should amend our state constitutions, and I will stick to that position until such time, if ever, a higher court says that my state or another state has to recognize the other status — another status of marriage.

I am committed to maintaining the unique status of marriage between man and woman. I think it can best be accomplished, and in keeping with my federalist philosophy that states should do as much as possible to have that done at the state level. But if it is overturned by a superior court, I will then obviously support the other path.

The Republican Party Platform calls for two amendments to the Constitution: a human life amendment and a marriage amendment. They read thusly:

We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and we endorse legislation to make it clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.

We strongly support President Bush’s call for a Constitutional amendment that fully protects marriage, and we believe that neither federal nor state judges nor bureaucrats should force states to recognize other living arrangements as equivalent to marriage…Attempts to redefine marriage in a single state or city could have serious consequences throughout the country, and anything less than a Constitutional amendment, passed by the Congress and ratified by the states, is vulnerable to being overturned by activist judges.

John McCain has acquired the reputation of being a “straight talking maverick.” I will not object to the label; I will only say that if straight talking is a virtue, it nevertheless is no virtue to “straight talk” out of both sides of one’s mouth. Hannity’s question was very carefully crafted in order to ensure that John McCain would not have to say that he actually supports the pro-life and marriage planks of the GOP platform. Hannity pulled this off by asking him whether he would leave the language of those issues intact in the platform. The fact is that John McCain does not support either a human life amendment or a federal marriage amendment. Consider McCain’s response to Hannity, for example. After saying that he would not seek to change the marriage amendment language in the Republican platform, McCain goes on to say that he does not actually support what that platform says.

Is Sean Hannity really comfortable going on national television and suggesting to social conservatives that John McCain supports their cause? He does not. What has become clear about McCain is that his straight talk really is just double talk. But what is worse is Sean Hannity’s attempt to advocate McCain’s candidacy to social conservatives by suggesting that he really supports the issues. Is it really supposed to be some consolation that, even though McCain neither supports a human life amendment nor a federal marriage amendment, he nevertheless does not have a problem leaving the human life and marriage amendment language in the platform?

| Mr. MacIan | Leave a comment

G. K. Chesterton: On Relativism

Filed Under: Philosophy

An imbecile habit has arisen in modern controversy of saying that such and such a creed can be held in one age but cannot be held in another.  Some dogma, we are told, was credible in the twelfth century, but is not credible in the twentieth.  You might as well say that a certain philosophy can be believed on Mondays, but cannot be believed on Tuesdays.  You might as well say of a view of the cosmos that it was suitable to half-past three, but not suitable to half-past four.  What a man can believe depends upon his philosophy, not upon the clock or century.  If a man believes in unalterable natural law, he cannot believe in any miracle in any age.  If a man believes in a will behind law, he can believe in any miracle in any age.  Suppose, for the sake of argument, we are concerned with a case of thaumaturgic healing.  A materialist of the twelfth century could not believe it any more than a materialist of the twentieth century.  But a Christian Scientist of the twentieth century can believe it as much as a Christian of the twelfth century.  It is simply a matter of a man’s theory of things.

- Orthodoxy, G. K. Chesterton

| Mr. MacIan | Leave a comment

RC Sproul interviews Ben Stein about the movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

Filed Under: Other
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4609561480192587449
| doctor horton | 1 Comment